Basic disclaimer: my POV is that nobody owes anything to anyone. That said...
I always thought that positive comments can be very generic (Looks good to me) but negative ones need to be specific.
So I would do either: "This looks weird to me because..." or "This looks rather strange to me. But I don't really know the language. So maybe just that"...
Edited (Typo. Better choice of words.) 2024-04-22 17:24 (UTC)
no subject
The code does look weird (to me).
no subject
no subject
I don't know go; so this piece looks (to me) just weird:
Just the language.
no subject
Put a long list of function args one-per-line. Thought it would be easier to read...
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Could you tell what your reply would be when receiving a comment like yours? Lol.
no subject
Depending on who comments. Since I don't know go, and last time I saw it was about 15 years ago... But I bet some Scala code looks much weirder.
no subject
I always thought that positive comments can be very generic (Looks good to me) but negative ones need to be specific.
So I would do either: "This looks weird to me because..." or "This looks rather strange to me. But I don't really know the language. So maybe just that"...
no subject
In this case, I got a feeling that this code structure is very unusual. I'll take a look again tomorrow.
no subject
no subject
:) Но гошечку я так и не знаю. Тут вот забрезжил сейчас Unison.
no subject
Дайте мне знать если они будут нанимать. Моё количество активных работ постепенно упало с двух до нуля :) Так что я сейчас в активном поиске.
no subject
Они - это Рунар и Пол. Не знаю, там кто-нибудь ещё участвует или нет.
no subject
no subject
Runar Bjarnason, Paul Chiusano. Авторы "красной книги" про функциональную Скалу.
no subject
Таким большим людям, точно, не будет интересны плебеи (зачёркнуто) "просто программисты", типа меня.
no subject
Думаю, у них и денег нет. На свои работать.
no subject